六级课程经典
零基础适用HOT
去试听
六级1对1
定制化
核心词 背词计划
0元
听力 提升必看
0元
阅读 冲刺200+
0元
写作 高分模板
0元
历年真题大全
免费
十天搞定 六级词汇
热门
1V1速成方案VIP
考研真题集免费
大二生 考研资料
全套
2021年12月英语六级阅读真题及答案解析(卷一)
Do music lessons really make children smarter ?
点击广告图,第一时间查看考后真题解析↑↑↑↑
【A】A recent analysis found that most research mischaracterizes the relationship between music and skills enhancement.
【B】In 2004, a paper appeared in the journal Psychological Science, titled “Music Lessons Enhance IQ.” The author, composer and University of Toronto Mississauga psychologist Glenn Schellenberg, had conducted an experiment with 144 children randomly assigned to four groups: one learned the keyboard for a year, one took singing lessons, one joined an acting class, and a control group had no extracurricular training. The IQ of the children in the two musical groups rose by an average of seven points in the course of a year; those in the other two groups gained an average of 4.3 points.
【C】Schellenberg had long been skeptical of the science underpinning claims that music education enhances children’s abstract reasoning, math, or language skills. If children who play the piano are smarter, he says, it doesn’t necessarily mean they are smarter because they play the piano. It could be that the youngsters who play the piano also happen to be more ambitious or better at focusing on a task. Correlation, after all, does not prove causation.
38.[C] Schellenber was doubt about the claim that music education helps enhance children's intelligence.
【D】The 2004 paper was specifically designed to address those concerns. And as a passionate musician, Schellenberg was delighted when he turned up credible evidence that music has transfer effects on general intelligence. But nearly a decade later, in 2013, the Education Endowment Foundation funded a bigger study with more than 900 students. That study failed to corroborate Schellenberg’s findings, finding no evidence that music lessons improved math and literacy skills.
【E】Schellenberg took that news in stride while continuing to cast a skeptical eye on the research in his field. Recently, he decided to formally investigate just how often his fellow researchers in psychology and neuroscience make what he believes are erroneous — or at least premature — causal connections between music and intelligence. His results, published in May, suggest that many of his peers do just that.
36.[E] Glenn Schellenberg's lastest research suggests many psychologists and neuroscientists wrongly believe in the casual relationship between music and intelligence.
【F】To pinpoint precisely how music lessons change the brain over time, scientists would ideally assign children randomly to different groups, as Schellenberg did in his 2004 study, only over a longer period of time. One group of children might be assigned to take piano lessons for years, while the other group would receive no music education at all. Because this is generally not possible to do for the sake of a psychological experiment, many researchers rely on studies where they compare children who already take lessons to those who don’t, correcting for variables such as socioeconomic status. But even with this correction, such studies can only find correlation; they cannot prove causation.
For his recent study, Schellenberg asked two research assistants to look for correlational studies on the effects of music education. They found a total of 114 papers published since 2000. To assess whether the authors claimed any causation, researchers then looked for telltale verbs in each paper’s title and abstract, verbs like “enhance,” “promote,“ “facilitate,” and “strengthen.” The papers were categorized as neuroscience if the study employed an electroencephalogram or a brain imaging method like magnetic resonance, or if the study appeared in a journal that had “brain,” “neuroscience,” or a related term in its title. Otherwise the papers were categorized as psychology. Schellenberg didn’t tell his assistants what exactly he was trying to prove.
【G】After computing their assessments, Schellenberg concluded that the majority of the articles fallaciously claimed that music training had a causal effect. The overselling, he also found, was more prevalent among neuroscience studies, three quarters of which mischaracterized a mere association between music training and skills enhancement as a cause-and-effect relationship. This may come as a surprise to some. Psychologists have been battling chargesthat they don’t do “real” science for some time — in large part because many findings from classic experiments have proved unreproducible. Neuroscientists, on the other hand, armed with brain scans and EEGs, have not been subject to the same degree of critique.
“I have never thought that flute lessons make you better at solving differential equations,” said Lutz Jäncke, a neuropsychologist from the University of Zurich in Switzerland who praised Schellenberg’s new study. “His criticism is justified.”
NOT EVERYONE agrees. “Most neuroscientists are not quite as stupid as Glenn seems to think they are,” wrote Robert Zatorre, a neuroscientist at McGill University in Montreal and an authority on the science of music and the brain, in an email to Undark. He added that “just looking to see whether a publication uses causal language decontextualizes the way that an author may have nuanced or interpreted their findings.”
In other words: the authors might write a catchy headline or abstract, but use more cautionary language in the fine print of their articles. (Schellenberg pointed out that those are the elements of an article that other scientists read first, sometimes exclusively.)
Zatorre compared Schellenberg’s view to that of “climate change deniers who say that there is no need to worry about greenhouse gases changing the climate” because our knowledge of climate change is “based entirely on correlational evidence.”
【H】To argue for a cause-and-effect relationship, scientists must attempt to explain why and how a connection could occur. When it comes to transfer effects of music, scientists frequently point to brain plasticity — the fact that the brain changes according to how we use it. When a child learns to play the violin, for example, several studies have shown that the brain region responsible for the fine motor skills of the left hand’s fingers is likely to grow. And many experiments have shown that musical training improves certain hearing capabilities, like filtering voices from background noise or distinguishing the difference between the consonants(辅音) ‘b’ and ‘g’.
【I】But Schellenberg remains highly critical of how the concept of plasticity has been applied in his field. “Plasticity has become an industry of its own,” he wrote in his May paper. Practice does change the brain, he allows, but what is questionable is the assertion that these changes affect other brain regions, such as those responsible for spatial reasoning or math problems.
【J】Jäncke agrees. “Most of these studies don’t allow for causal inferences,” he said. For over two decades, Jäncke has researched the effects of music lessons, and like Schellenberg, he believes that the only way to truly understand their effects is to run longitudinal studies. In such studies, researchers would need to follow groups of children with and without music lessons over a long period of time — even if the assignments are not completely random. Then they could compare outcomes for each group.
【K】Some researchers are starting to do just that. The neuroscientist Peter Schneider from Heidelberg University in Germany, for example, has been following a group of childrenfor ten years now. Some of them were handed musical instruments and given lessons through a school-based program in the Ruhr region of Germany called Jedem Kind ein Instrument, or "an instrument for every child," which was carried out with government funding. Among these children, Schneider has found that the those who were enthusiastic about music and who practiced voluntarily showed improvements in hearing ability, as well as in more general competencies, such as the ability to concentrate.
【L】To establish whether effects such as improved concentration are caused by music participation itself, and not by investing time in an extracurricular activity of any kind, Assal Habibi, a psychology professor at the University of Southern California, is conducting a five-year longitudinal study with children from low-income communities in Los Angeles. The youngsters fall into three groups: those who take after-school music, those who do after-school sports, and those with no structured after-school program at all. After two years, Habibi and her colleagues reportedseeing structural changes in the brains of the musically trained children, both locally and in the pathways connecting different parts of the brain.
【M】That may seem compelling, but Habibi’s children were not selected randomly. Did the children who were drawn to music perhaps have something in them from the start that made them different but eluded the brain scanners? “As somebody who started taking piano lessons at the age of five and got up every morning at seven to practice, that experience changed me and made me part of who I am today,” Schellenberg said. “The question is whether those kinds of experiences do so systematically across individuals and create exactly the same changes. And I think that is that huge leap of faith.”
【N】Did he have a hidden talent that others didn’t have? Or more endurance than his peers? Music researchers tend, like Schellenberg, to be musicians themselves, and as he noted in his recent paper, “the idea of positive cognitive and neural side effects from music training (and other pleasurable activities) is inherently appealing.” He also admits that if he had children of his own, he would encourage them to take music lessons and go to university. “I would think that it makes them better people, more critical, just wiser in general,” he said.
37.[N] The belief in the positive effects of music trainning appeals to many researchers who are musicians themselves.
【O】But those convictions should be checked at the entrance to the lab, he added. Otherwise, the work becomes religion or faith. “You have to let go of your faith if you want to be a scientist.”
Section C 仔细阅读
Passage 1
考察内容:The trend toward rationality and enlightenmentwas endangered long before the advent of theWorld Wide Web.
题目对应原文:
46. A) It initiated a change from dominance of reason to supremacy of pleasure.
47.D) It is conducive to critical thinking.
48. D) It has rendered their interactions more superficial.
49.C) It was viewed as a means to quest for knowledge.
50. B) They are constantly seeking approval from their audience.
Passage 2
考察内容:工人启蒙
题目对应原文:According to a recent study, a small but growingproportion of the workforce is affected to somedegree by a sense of entitlement.
51. B) They feel they deserve more than they get.
52. B) They were spoiled when growing up.
53. D) Seek ways to sustain their motivation.
54. C) They convey their requirements in a straightforward way.
55.A) Those who can be counted on to fulfill commitments.
新东方英语六级好课免费听↓↓↓
课程名称 | 课程亮点 | 试听 |
【小班课】英语四六级零基础无忧计划 | 1V1答疑 | 免费试听 |
【零基础】四六级全科专项突破 | 单项全面进阶 | 免费试听 |
【阅读】四六级阅读高分技巧 | 双师精讲阅读 | 免费试听 |
【写作】四六级写作万能模板 | 双师精讲写作 | 免费试听 |
【听力】四六级听力高分技巧 | 双师精讲听力 | 免费试听 |
【寒假班】英语四六级全程班 | 考前冲分快准狠 | 免费试听 |
了解更多四六级课程 |
本文关键字: 英语六级阅读理解真题 六级真题
资料下载
2022年大选英语四级词汇完整带音标
发布时间:2020-04-15关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
刘一男六级核心词汇完整版
发布时间:2020-04-15关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
新东方英语口语终极教程word版
发布时间:2020-04-15关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【口语提升】获取
大学英语六级:练口语及单词lesson1-9
发布时间:2020-04-15关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【口语提升】获取
新东方在线[四六级王牌团队]典藏笔记
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【典藏笔记】获取
英语六级过级备考资料:经验+计划+语法
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级经验】获取
大学英语六级阅读解题经验技巧
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【阅读礼包】获取
英语四级写作诵读193经典句
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【写作指导】获取
英语六级听力讲义汇总资料
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【听力礼包】获取
英语六级口语考试练习小积累
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【口语提升】获取
大学英语六级核心高频词汇
发布时间:2019-10-25关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号回复【典藏笔记】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号,
获取学习资料
推荐阅读
更多>>2023年12月英语六级真题及答案(第三套)包括听力和笔试部分,笔试部分为图片版,支持免费下载。
来源 : 新东方在线 2024-02-29 10:07:59 关键字 : 2023年12月六级真题
2023年12月英语六级真题及答案(第二套)包括听力和笔试部分,笔试部分为图片版,支持免费下载。
来源 : 新东方在线 2024-02-29 10:07:04 关键字 : 2023年12月六级真题
2023年12月英语六级真题及答案(第一套)包括听力和笔试部分,笔试部分为图片版,支持免费下载。
来源 : 新东方在线 2024-02-29 10:00:32 关键字 : 2023年12月六级真题
2023年12月英语六级考试已经在12月16日下午结束了,相信同学们想对下六级答案,估算下自己的六级成绩。新东方六级老师已经第一时间整理
来源 : 新东方在线 2023-12-16 17:14:09 关键字 : 六级听力答案,六级听力真题
2023年12月英语六级考试已经在12月16日下午结束了,相信同学们想对下六级答案,估算下自己的六级成绩。新东方六级老师已经第
来源 : 新东方在线 2023-12-16 17:26:00 关键字 : 六级听力原文,六级听力答案
资料下载
更多>>关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【口语提升】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【口语提升】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【典藏笔记】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级经验】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【阅读礼包】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【写作指导】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【听力礼包】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【口语提升】获取
关注四六级小助手服务号
回复【过级词汇】获取
阅读排行榜
相关内容